Spellings variously given as full-fledged variants, informal, or other in the dictionaries noted
| donut: |
full variant in Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd |
| thru: | full variant in Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd; "informal" in Amer Heri 3rd|
| drive-thru: | full variant in Rand Coll 2nd|
| see-thru: | full variant in Rand Coll 2nd|
| tho: | full variant in Merr-Webs 10th; "a simplified spelling" in Rand|
| altho: | full variant in Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th; "pronunciation|
| thoro: | "a simplified spelling" in Rand Coll 2nd; "nonstandard|
| sluff: | (for "slough" meaning "to shed/discard/shirk") full variant in|
| hifalutin: | full variant Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd|
| hijinks: | full variant in Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd|
| hi-tech: | full variant in Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd|
| hi-hat: | (cymbals) full variant in Merr-Webs 10th|
| nite: | full variant in Merr-Webs 10th; "an informal, simplified spelling" in Rand Coll 2nd|
| penlite: | full variant in Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| analog: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| dialog: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| epilog: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| monolog: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| prolog: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| travelog: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| ideolog: | Merr-Webs 10th
| Decalog: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| synagog: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| demagog: | Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| pedagog: | Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| esthetic: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| esthetically: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| esthete: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| subpena: | Rand Coll 2nd, Webs 3rd Intl
| merchandize: | (when used as a verb) Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| surprize: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th
| exorcize: | Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| advertize: | Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Unab 2nd
| comprize: | Rand Unab 2nd, Webs 3rd Intl
| emprize: | Rand Coll 2nd
| enterprize: | Webs 3rd Intl
| liquify: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th
| rarify: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th
| putrify: | Webs 3rd Intl
| gage: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| harken: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| hight | (as a variant of "height"): Rand Unab 2nd, Webs 3rd Intl
| trolly: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| epinephrin: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| dumfound: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| franticly: | Amer Heri 3rd, Rand Unab 2nd, Webs 3rd Intl
| aline: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Unab 2nd
| alinement: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Unab 2nd
| rime: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| templet: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Coll 2nd
| miniscule: | Amer Heri 3rd, Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Unab 2nd
| momento: | Merr-Webs 10th, Rand Unab 2nd
"Alright" is given as a variant for "all right" in "Merriam- Webster's Collegiate" 10th and "Random House College" 2nd; entries in both dictionaries contain usage notes stating that "alright" does occur often in dialog and informal writing, but that "all right" is still the only form for formal writing. The "American Heritage" 3rd gives "alright" as a "non-standard" spelling.
"Ameba" is the first given spelling in most American medical and scientific dictionaries as of the late 1990s. Further, the entry in the "Random House College," 2nd Edition (1997) reads:
| ameba or amoeba (n.) .. | ..
"Lite" is used in published, edited matter, and basically only for one quite specialized meaning, "having fewer calories," or figuratively, "having less substance." But "lite" really isn't used in print for other meanings of "light"; in fact, "lite" is emerging as an entity on its own, with a literal meaning it got from "light" (fewer calories) and has, as its own word now, developed an additional figurative meaning.
The "American Heritage Dictionary," 3rd Edition has an entry for "lite" which reads:
| _ | ||
|---|---|---|
| lite (l | i | t), _adj._ _Slang._ Having less substance or |
| weight or fewer calories than something else: _"lite | ||
| music, shimmering on the surface and squishy soft at | ||
| the core"_ (Mother Jones) [Alteration of LIGHT 2.] |
(LIGHT 2 in this edition is the adjective meaning "not heavy; exerting little force," etc.; LIGHT 1 is "light" meaning luminescence.)
In "Merriam-Webster's Collegiate" 10th, the entry for "lite" is:
| _ | ||
|---|---|---|
| lite \'l | i | t\, _var of_ 4 LIGHT 9a |
The 2nd Edition of the "Random House College" has:
| _ | ||
|---|---|---|
| lite (l | i | t), _adj._ an informal, simplified spelling |
| of LIGHT 2, used esp. in labeling, naming, or | ||
| advertising commercial products. --lite'ness, _n._ |
It's interesting too to note that the "Random House" entry also gives a word "derived" from "lite," the noun "liteness."
Another note on this spelling is that, while no dictionary lists "lite" as a valid variant for "light" in terms of "luminescence," two dictionaries (noted near the top of this list) do list "penlite" (and this certainly doesn't mean "a pen with less ink" :-) ).
"Gonna" is listed as a "pronunciation spelling" for "going to" when used in future tenses in the "Random House College," 2nd Edition, and "gotta" is also listed in that volume as a "pronunciation spelling" for "(have) got to." "Gimme" for "give me" and "U" for "you" are given in that volume of "Random House" as pronunciation spellings as well.
Is "e-mail" an acceptable variant of "E-mail"? According to the "Random House College" 2nd (1997), it's more than that. The entry there begins:
e-mail or E-mail ....
In "Merriam-Webster's Collegiate" 10th (1993) the entry for this gives "E-mail" with the capital letter as the only possibility.
By Cornell Kimball